Status Approved
First Submitted Date
2020/10/14
Registered Date
2020/10/21
Last Updated Date
2024/01/25
CRIS Required
WHO ICTRP (International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) Required
1. Background
CRIS Registration Number |
KCT0005520 |
---|---|
Unique Protocol ID | CNUH2020-07-028-002 |
Public/Brief Title | Clinical Evaluation of Usefulness and Effectiveness of Sitting Type Continuous Passive Motion Machine for Patients with Knee Joint Surgery |
Scientific Title | Clinical Evaluation of Usefulness and Effectiveness of Sitting Type Continuous Passive Motion Machine for Patients with Knee Joint Surgery |
Acronym | |
MFDS Regulated Study | No |
IND/IDE Protocol | No |
Registered at Other Registry | No |
Healthcare Benefit Approval Status | Submitted approval |
2. Institutional Review Board / Ethics Committee
Board Approval Status | Submitted approval |
---|---|
Board Approval Number | 2020-07-028-002 |
Approval Date | 2020-09-02 |
Institutional Review Board Name | Chungnam national university hospital institutional review board |
Institutional Review Board Address | 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon |
Institutional Review Board Telephone | 042-280-8715 |
Data Monitoring Committee | No |
3. Contact Details
Contact Person for Principal Investigator / Scientific Queries | |
---|---|
Name | Kang-hee Cho |
Title | Professor |
Telephone | +82-42-338-2355 |
Affiliation | Chungnam National University Hospital |
Address | 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon |
Contact Person for Public Queries | |
Name | Chang-won Moon |
Title | Professor |
Telephone | +82-42-338-2406 |
Affiliation | Chungnam National University Hospital |
Address | 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon |
Contact Person for Updating Information | |
Name | Woo-sung Choi |
Title | Research Engineer |
Telephone | +82-42-338-2985 |
Affiliation | Chungnam National University Hospital |
Address | 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon |
4. Status
Study Site | Multi-center Number of center : 2 | |
---|---|---|
Overall Recruitment Status | Completed | |
Date of First Enrollment | 2020-11-10 Actual | |
Target Number of Participant | 210 | |
Primary Completion Date | 2023-03-30 , Actual | |
Study Completion Date | 2023-03-30 , Actual | |
Recruitment Status by Participating Study Site 1 | ||
Name of Study | The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital | |
Recruitment Status | Recruiting | |
Date of First Enrollment | 2020-11-11 , | |
Recruitment Status by Participating Study Site 2 | ||
Name of Study | Chungnam National University Hospital | |
Recruitment Status | Completed | |
Date of First Enrollment | 2020-11-10 , |
5. Source of Monetary / Material Support
1. Source of Monetary/Material Support | |
---|---|
Organization Name | Korea Medical Device Development Fund |
Organization Type | Government |
Project ID | KMDF_PR_20200901_023 |
6. Sponsor Organization
1. Sponsor Organization | |
---|---|
Organization Name | Chungnam National University |
Organization Type | University |
7. Study Summary
Lay Summary | Postoperative joint movement exercise is essential to prevent joint construction, restore function, and reduce edema after knee joint surgery such as total knee arthroplasty, knee ligament reconstruction, and fixation after knee fracture. Joint movement exercise after knee joint surgery is performed through passive joint movement exercise by a physical therapist, passive joint movement using a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine, and self-manual joint movement through education of patients and guardians. Due to the limited rehabilitation medical cost, passive joint movement exercise by physical therapists is offered generally a maximum of 10 minutes per day. And self-manual joint exercises are not performed at a high rate. Therefore, most of the joint movement exercises are performed through a continuous passive motion machine. The traditional CPM machine is a lying type, and there is a severe gap between the actual patient's range of motion (joint angle) and the machine's range of motion. Hence, it is difficult to clarify the effectiveness because of the subjective setting of the range of motion of the CPM machine. The recently developed sitting type CPM machine is currently the only type domestically and internationally. And it is expected to have an advantage in setting the machine motion range as there is a little gap between the actual patient's range of motion and the machine's range of motion. However, there are no clinical studies. This study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial for clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of a lying type(traditional) CPM machine and a sitting type CPM machine in patients with total knee arthroplasty. To improving the methodological defects of existing CPM machine-related studies, the blind evaluator measures the patient's actual range of motion of the knee joint before applying the CPM machine, and set the corresponding machine value. Through this increases the objectivity of the study results and verifies power through a large-scale randomized controlled study. |
---|
8. Study Design
Study Type | Interventional Study |
---|---|
Study Purpose | Treatment |
Phase | Phase1 |
Intervention Model | Factorial |
Blinding/Masking | Single |
Blinded Subject | Investigator |
Allocation | RCT |
Intervention Type | Medical Device |
Intervention Description | Group 1. Lying-type CPM group: Adaptation training and intervention using a lying-type CPM machine were conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days Group 2-1. Lying-type and Sitting-type CPM complex group-1: Adaptation training and 4 interventions using a lying-type CPM machine were conducted twice a day for a total of 5 days, after that, intervention using the sitting-type CPM machine twice a day for a total of 5 days Group 2-2. Lying-type and Sitting-type CPM complex group-2: Adaptation training and 4 interventions using sitting-type CPM machine were conducted twice a day for a total of 5 days, after that, intervention using the lying-type CPM machine twice a day for a total of 5 days Group 3. Sitting-type CPM group: Adaptation training and intervention using a sitting-type CPM machine were conducted twice a day for a total of 10 days |
Number of Arms | 3 |
Arm 1 |
Arm Label Lying-type CPM group |
Target Number of Participant 70 |
|
Arm Type Active comparator |
|
Arm Description 1st session - CPM adaptation training using a lying-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the passive range of motion(PROM), flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 30 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 2nd-10th session - Intervention using a lying-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the passive range of motion(PROM), flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day -Intervention period: 10 times/week, total 20 times for 2weeks |
|
Arm 2 |
Arm Label Lying-type and sitting-type CPM complex group |
Target Number of Participant 70 |
|
Arm Type Active comparator |
|
Arm Description To minimize the disturbance according to the type of CPM machine performed at the beginning of the operation in the complex group, it was divided into 2 groups through random assignment, and the order was changed and applied. 1) Lying-type to Sitting-type CPM complex group 1st session - CPM adaptation training using a lying-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the passive range of motion(PROM), flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 30 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 2nd-5th session - Intervention using a lying-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the PROM, flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 6th-10th session - Intervention using a sitting-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the PROM, flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day -Intervention period: 10 times/week, total 20 times for 2weeks 1) Sitting-type to Lying-type CPM complex group 1st session - CPM adaptation training using a sitting-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the passive range of motion(PROM), flexion -10 degrees -Intervention time: 30 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 2nd-5th session - Intervention using a sitting-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the PROM, extension -10 degrees, flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 6th-10th session - Intervention using a lying-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the PROM, extension -10 degrees, flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day -Intervention period: 10 times/week, total 20 times for 2weeks |
|
Arm 3 |
Arm Label Sitting-type CMP group |
Target Number of Participant 70 |
|
Arm Type Experimental |
|
Arm Description 1st session - CPM adaptation training using a sitting-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the passive range of motion(PROM), flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 30 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day 2nd-10th session - Intervention using a sitting-type CPM machine -Range of motion: Based on the PROM, flexion +10 degrees -Intervention time: 60 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, twice a day -Intervention period: 10 times/week, total 20 times for 2weeks |
9. Subject Eligibility
Condition(s)/Problem(s) |
* (M00-M99)Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M13.96)Arthritis, unspecified, lower leg Subjects who receive unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients |
---|---|
Rare Disease | No |
Inclusion Criteria |
Gender Both |
Age 19Year~No Limit |
|
Description patients planned to receive primary unilateral TKA due to degenerative changes. Other inclusion criteria will be as follows; 1) age 19 years or older. 2) The patient agrees to participate in this randomized trial. |
|
Exclusion Criteria |
The exclusion criteria will be as follows; 1) age under 60 years old, or over 90 years old 2) other causes of arthritis than degenerative changes (infection, traumatic, and inflammatory joint disease) 3) history of previous hip, knee, and ankle orthopedic surgery 4) history of previous lumbar surgery within 3month of study 5) serious nervous system, cardiovascular diseases, or osteoporosis 6) having coagulation disorders 7) obese patient whose body mass index is more than 35kg/m2 8) inability to understand the study protocols due to cognitive deficits or language problems 9) refuse to participate |
Healthy Volunteers | No |
10. Outcome Measure(s)
Type of Primary Outcome | Efficacy | |
---|---|---|
Primary Outcome(s) 1 | ||
Outcome | Passive range of motion |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 1 | ||
Outcome | Pain (Numeric rating scale) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 2 | ||
Outcome | Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis (WOMAC) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 3 | ||
Outcome | Knee Society Score (KSS) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 4 | ||
Outcome | Kujala Score |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 5 | ||
Outcome | Patient's satisfaction questionnaire |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 6 | ||
Outcome | Swelling of lower limb measured by circumference (10cm above patella upper pole, 10cm below the tibial tuberosity) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 7 | ||
Outcome | Time Up and Go Test (TUG) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 8 | ||
Outcome | 6m Walking Test (6MWT) |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 9 | ||
Outcome | Isokinetic strengthening of flexion and extension in knee joint |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 10 | ||
Outcome | Active range of motion in knee joint |
|
Timepoint | 2020.10. - |
11. Study Results and Publication
Result Registered | No |
---|
12. Sharing of Study Data(Deidentified Individual-Patient Data, IPD)
Sharing Statement | No |
---|
TOP
BOTTOM
화면 최하단으로 이동