Status Approved
First Submitted Date
2019/04/08
Registered Date
2019/04/12
Last Updated Date
2020/07/13
CRIS Required
WHO ICTRP (International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) Required
1. Background
CRIS Registration Number |
KCT0003746 |
---|---|
Unique Protocol ID | EUMC 2018-07-087-001 |
Public/Brief Title | Assessment of perioperative atelectasis by lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: comparison of conventional versus protective ventilation |
Scientific Title | Assessment of perioperative atelectasis by lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: comparison of conventional versus protective ventilation |
Acronym | |
MFDS Regulated Study | No |
IND/IDE Protocol | No |
Registered at Other Registry | No |
Healthcare Benefit Approval Status | Not applicable |
2. Institutional Review Board / Ethics Committee
Board Approval Status | Submitted approval |
---|---|
Board Approval Number | EUMC 2018-07-087-001 |
Approval Date | 2018-09-21 |
Institutional Review Board Name | institutional review board of Ewha Womans Hospital |
Institutional Review Board Address | 1071, Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul |
Institutional Review Board Telephone | 02-2650-5872 |
Data Monitoring Committee | No |
3. Contact Details
Contact Person for Principal Investigator / Scientific Queries | |
---|---|
Name | JAE HEE WOO |
Title | Assistant Professor |
Telephone | +82-2-6986-4959 |
Affiliation | Ewha Womans University Medical Center |
Address | 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07804, Korea |
Contact Person for Public Queries | |
Name | JAE HEE WOO |
Title | Assistant Professor |
Telephone | +82-2-6986-4959 |
Affiliation | Ewha Womans University Medical Center |
Address | 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07804, Korea |
Contact Person for Updating Information | |
Name | JAE HEE WOO |
Title | Assistant Professor |
Telephone | +82-2-6986-4959 |
Affiliation | Ewha Womans University Medical Center |
Address | 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07804, Korea |
4. Status
Study Site | Single | |
---|---|---|
Overall Recruitment Status | Completed | |
Date of First Enrollment | 2018-10-22 Actual | |
Target Number of Participant | 42 | |
Primary Completion Date | 2019-08-13 , Actual | |
Study Completion Date | 2019-11-30 , Actual | |
Recruitment Status by Participating Study Site 1 | ||
Name of Study | Ewha Womans University Medical Center | |
Recruitment Status | Completed | |
Date of First Enrollment | 2018-10-22 , |
5. Source of Monetary / Material Support
1. Source of Monetary/Material Support | |
---|---|
Organization Name | Ewha Womans University Medical Center |
Organization Type | Medical Institute |
Project ID | |
2. Source of Monetary/Material Support | |
Organization Name | Ministry of Science and ICT |
Organization Type | Government |
Project ID | NRF-2017R1C1B5018202 |
6. Sponsor Organization
1. Sponsor Organization | |
---|---|
Organization Name | Ewha Womans University Medical Center |
Organization Type | Medical Institute |
7. Study Summary
Lay Summary | The purpose of this study was to evaluate lung ultrasound (LUS) score to determine the effect of protective closure technique on the incidence of atelectasis in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. In a retrospective analysis of 11,000 non-cardiac anesthesia during surgery, hypoxia is defined as a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) to oxygen fraction (FiO2) of less than 300, and approximately 50% of patients with general anesthesia develop hypoxia. Hypoxia, which occurs during general anesthesia, is caused by the shunt of pulmonary blood flow due to atelectasis. After abdominal surgery, diaphragmatic dysfunction is associated with atelectasis, pulmonary collapse or pneumonia, which may lead to longer hospital stay and increased medical costs. Several studies have shown that lung ultrasound is useful for tracking respiratory complications in patients undergoing surgery. Protective ventilation is commonly used in patients under general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of protective ventilation on the incidence of atelectasis using lung ultrasound. |
---|
8. Study Design
Study Type | Interventional Study |
---|---|
Study Purpose | Diagnosis |
Phase | Not applicable |
Intervention Model | Parallel |
Blinding/Masking | Double |
Blinded Subject | Subject, Investigator, Caregiver |
Allocation | RCT |
Intervention Type | /Procedure/Surgery |
Intervention Description | Patients are divided into groups that receive a traditional or protective ventilation by randomization. For patients receiving conventional ventilation, a tidal volume of 9-10 ml / kg predicted body weight is used with no PEEP. In patients using the protective ventilation, a tidal volume of 6 - 8 ml / kg predicted body weight and PEEP 5 mmHg will be applied after induction of anesthesia. Lung ultrasound is performed at each of the following time points; before the induction of anesthesia, 5 minute after the mechanical ventilation, and at the end of the operation and in the recovery room. All ultrasound examinations are performed by the same anesthesiologist who has more than 100 pulmonary ultrasound scan experience. We analyzed the pulmonary ultrasound scores according to the time of both groups. |
Number of Arms | 2 |
Arm 1 |
Arm Label conventional ventilation |
Target Number of Participant 21 |
|
Arm Type Active comparator |
|
Arm Description For patients receiving conventional ventilation, a tidal volume of 9-10 ml / kg predicted body weight is used with no PEEP. |
|
Arm 2 |
Arm Label protective ventilation |
Target Number of Participant 21 |
|
Arm Type Experimental |
|
Arm Description In patients using the protective ventilation, a tidal volume of 6-8 ml / kg predicted body weight and PEEP 5 mmHg will be applied after induction of anesthesia. |
9. Subject Eligibility
Condition(s)/Problem(s) |
* (J00-J99)Diseases of the respiratory system (J98.10)Atelectasis patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia |
---|---|
Rare Disease | No |
Inclusion Criteria |
Gender Both |
Age 19Year~No Limit |
|
Description 19 or older with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III, who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery with an expected duration of more than 2 h |
|
Exclusion Criteria |
(BMI)> 40 kg / m 2, American College of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or V, history of thoracic surgery including chest tube, severe obstructive pulmonary disease, difficult to cooperate, nervous system disease, diaphragmatic paralysis, a history of mechanical ventilation within a month preceding surgery |
Healthy Volunteers | No |
10. Outcome Measure(s)
Type of Primary Outcome | /Safety/Efficacy | |
---|---|---|
Primary Outcome(s) 1 | ||
Outcome | LUS (lung ultrasound score) score |
|
Timepoint | Immediately before induction of anesthesia, 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia,After the operation,Recovery room |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) 1 | ||
Outcome | arterial blood gas analysis |
|
Timepoint | Immediately before induction of anesthesia, 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia,After the operation,Recovery room |
11. Study Results and Publication
Result Registered | No |
---|
12. Sharing of Study Data(Deidentified Individual-Patient Data, IPD)
Sharing Statement | No |
---|
TOP
BOTTOM
화면 최하단으로 이동